About This Appendix
Prescribed learning outcomes, expressed in measurable terms, provide the basis for the development of learning activities and assessment, and evaluation strategies. After a general discussion of assessment and evaluation, this appendix uses sample evaluation plans to show how activities, assessment, and evaluation might come together in a particular visual arts program. The generic assessment and evaluation tools at the end of this appendix provide further planning support for teachers.
Assessment and Evaluation
Assessment is the systematic gathering of information about what students know, are able to do, and are working toward. Assessment methods include: student self-assessments, reviews of performance, portfolio assessments, and conferencing. Assessment tools may include observation, daily practice assignments, quizzes, samples of student work, pencil-and-paper tests, holistic rating scales, projects, and oral and written reports.
Student performance is evaluated from the information collected through assessment activities. Teachers use their insight, knowledge about learning, and experience with students, along with the specific criteria they establish, to make judgments about student performance in relation to prescribed learning outcomes.
Students benefit most when evaluation is provided on a regular, ongoing basis. When evaluation is seen as an opportunity to promote learning rather than as a final judgment, it shows learners their strengths and suggests how they can develop further. Students can use this information to redirect efforts, make plans, and establish future learning goals.
Evaluation may take different forms, depending on the purpose.
In criterion-referenced evaluation, a student's performance is compared to established criteria rather than to the performance of other students. Evaluation referenced to prescribed curriculum requires that criteria are established based on the learning outcomes listed under the curriculum organizers for Visual Arts 8 to 10.
Criteria are the basis of evaluating student progress; they identify the critical aspects of a performance or a product that describe in specific terms what is involved in meeting the learning outcomes. Criteria can be used to evaluate student performance in relation to learning outcomes. For example, weighting criteria, using rating scales, or performance rubrics (reference sets) are three ways that student performance can be evaluated using criteria.
Samples of student performance should reflect learning outcomes and identified criteria. The samples clarify and make explicit the link between evaluation and learning outcomes, criteria, and assessment. Where a student's performance is not a product, and therefore not reproducible, a description of the performance sample should be provided.
Criterion-referenced evaluation may be based on these steps:
Legislation requires that teachers provide parents with three formal reports each year. The following are guidelines and suggestions for assigning letter grades. Letter grades are used to indicate a student's level of performance in relation to expected learning outcomes. They may be assigned for an activity, a unit of study, a term, as a final grade at the end of the year, or at the completion of a course or subject.
The assignment of letter grades may be based on these steps:
Visual arts education is an integrated program; assessment and evaluation should therefore reflect outcomes in all curriculum organizers. Consistent feedback is particularly important to successful development of visual arts skills, and to the development of a positive and enthusiastic attitude toward lifelong involvement in the arts. Helping students set goals and objectives for their own artistic development, and working with them to monitor their progress, are important responsibilities of all visual arts teachers.
Challenging oneself personally and exploring new ideas and learning styles are essential factors in artistic development. These explorations may be intimidating for students in that the final product or presentation may not meet the standard they might have achieved if they had "played it safe" and worked in a more familiar way. Students may be reluctant to challenge themselves or take risks with their work if they know that the end product will always be on display or presented to others publicly. While they should be encouraged to take pride in their artistic products, the creative problem-solving process is equal in importance to the resulting product. Much of the daily work in arts education will be process oriented; therefore, it should be made clear to students that these processes are valued as much as public presentation. Although not all work will result in a public presentation, whenever students' work is to be shown, it is essential that they be involved in the selection and decision-making process.
Assessment should be carried out in a variety of genres and contexts, which are articulated in this curriculum. Students particularly benefit when they participate in developing the assessment criteria. Tools and techniques include:
Artists continually record, explore, collect, develop, and review visual images. Students and teachers, like other artists, rely on two kinds of collections to further their development and understanding:
A portfolio is an ongoing collection of work that demonstrates a student's exploration in visual images. In Visual Arts 8 to 10, students' portfolios should contain artwork drawn from the four content areas: Image-Development and Design Strategies; Context; Visual Elements and Principles of Art and Design; Material, Technologies, and Processes. The portfolios may contain work in expression areas such as ceramics, drawing and painting, graphics (film, video, photography, printmaking, computer graphics), sculpture, and textiles. Portfolios, along with the artist statements, provide evidence that students are challenging themselves personally, exploring new ideas, and developing as artists.
Questions such as the following can stimulate and guide students' self-assessment of their portfolios:
Conferences can provide valuable information about students' understanding, thoughts, and feelings about visual arts subjects. Conferences may give the student an opportunity to reflect on the unit of study, and the teacher a chance to gather information about the student's knowledge and attitudes. A conference is also an opportunity to diagnose student needs. Conferences may take the form of a planned sequence of questions leading to an open-ended discussion, or they may require independent completion of specific questions. Informal conferences between the teacher and student should take place on a regular basis throughout instruction.
Observation Sheets
Observation sheets may be used to assess students during individual or co-operative activities. Teachers should focus their assessment by selecting only a few attributes for each observation. This information is useful when reporting on individual student progress.
Planning and Goal-Setting Worksheets
Setting individual goals for progress in visual arts is an important assessment strategy. Planning and goal-setting worksheets can be a basis for students' progress in the various units of a visual arts program. Such worksheets might include reflections on visual arts interests and abilities and might specify both short- and long-term goals.
Checklists
Checklists allow the teacher to observe the entire class "at a glance." They provide a quick reference for keeping track of specific information about student attitudes, knowledge, and skills. Checklists allow the teacher to create an individual record-keeping system organized in a variety of ways. Information might include date, skill-proficiency legends, or a simple checkmark identifying a yes or no. Checklists can be useful in developing a learning profile of a student that indicates growth over time. Checklists may be created to gather information about student co-operation, participation, attitude, leadership, or skill development.
Evaluation Samples
The samples on the following pages illustrate the process a teacher might use in applying criterion-referenced evaluation in visual arts. The samples represent a broad use of criterion-referenced evaluation, including individual pieces of work, units of study, and work completed over the course of a term.
There are three key stages to the process:
This section outlines:
This section illustrates the specific criteria, which are based on:
This section includes:
Province of British Columbia
Ministry of Education
Standards Department
© 1995 Copyright
Maintained by: Fine Arts Coordinator - Visual Arts
Revised: January 26, 1999
Ministry of Education Home Page