Forests Icon

Sample 4 - Grade 12


Topic: Factors Affecting Forest Fire Management

Prescribed Learning Outcomes:

Fire Management

It is expected that students will:

In addition to these outcomes, the teacher assessed the students' group and communication skills.

Overview

The teacher planned a series of lessons to assist students in identifying the causes, influencing factors, and impact of fire in a forest. Students also learned about prescribed burns as part of forest management and fire control and suppression techniques. Throughout the unit, the teacher focussed on students' abilities to effectively communicate to others their knowledge of fire management. Evaluation was based on:

Planning for Assessment and Evaluation

Research Developing Fire-Management Plans Pro  Team (A)
1. Introductory comments
3. Defense (pro reasons)
5. Questions for team B about their reasons
7. Answers to team B's questions
9. Summary of position
Con  Team (B)
2. Introductory comments
4. Rebut (con reasons)
6. Answers to team A's questions
8. Questions for team A about their reasons
10. Summary of position
Groups of students then developed and presented debates based on fire management topics such as: The teacher developed a rating scale to assess the debate presentations.

Developing Technical Manuals

Students worked in small groups and applied what they had learned in class, from guest speakers, and from personal research to develop short technical manuals on fire management procedures or pieces of equipment. Students discussed and agreed upon the following task requirements and criteria:

Defining the Criteria

Fire Management Plans

To what extent do students:

Debate

To what extent does the group:

Technical Manual

To what extent does the group:

Assessing and Evaluating Student Performance

The teacher observed as students participated in whole-class and small-group activities, taking note of behaviours that indicated whether they were achieving the criteria established for the unit. The teacher evaluated the quality of questions students asked and listened when they participated in discussions. While students worked in the classroom or on site, the teacher circulated, asking questions to probe their understanding of the concepts presented in the unit.

The teacher also provided students with the learning outcomes for the unit and had them work in small groups to each develop two test questions for each outcome. Groups then exchanged tests and completed them.

Fire Management Plans

The teacher assessed students' fire management plans by conducting student conferences. The teacher also used the reference sets Evaluating Problem Solving Across Curriculum and Evaluating Group Communication Skills Across Curriculum to assess the group presentations.

Debate

The teacher used a rating scale to evaluate each group's debating performance. The teacher provided feedback to students during group conferences and discussed with them ways they could improve their debating skills in the future.

Technical Manuals

Students used a rating scale to evaluate their own manuals and those of others. Any rating of 1 or 2 had to include specific recommendations for improvement.

 

Debate
Criteria Rating
  • clearly states and maintains position taken on the fire management issue
  • 5  4  3  2  1  0
  • defends position with evidence
  • 5  4  3  2  1  0
  • organizes ideas so others can understand them
  • 5  4  3  2  1  0
  • listens to opponent's position and responds with reference to it
  • 5  4  3  2  1  0
  • speaks clearly
  • 5  4  3  2  1  0
  • shows interest and enthusiasm through voice/gesture
  • 5  4  3  2  1  0

    Key:

    5-Excellent-Criteria met to an exceptional or unusual degree.
    4-Very Good-Criteria met in a very effective way.
    3-Good-Criteria met in a competent and an effective fashion.
    2-Satisfactory-Criteria met, but with considerable room for improvement.
    1-Minimally Acceptable-Criteria met to some extent.
    0-Not Evident-Criteria not met.

     

    Technical Manual
    CriteriaCommentsRating
  • complete (meets all task requirements)
  •   5  4  3  2  1  0
  • follows appropriate format and conventions (integrates visual and written information effectively)
  •   5  4  3  2  1  0
  • clear and precise (logical sequence; clear language; effective use of index, table of contents, titles to help reader)
  •   5  4  3  2  1  0
  • accurate (all needed steps and materials are correctly identified and described)
  •   5  4  3  2  1  0
  • efficient (concise, focussed, efficient in language and content, organized to allow for selective and rapid access to information)
  •   5  4  3  2  1  0
  • presentation (professional in appearance and meets a high standard for legibility)
  •   5  4  3  2  1  0

    Key:

    5-Excellent-Criteria met to an exceptional or unusual degree.
    4-Very Good-Criteria met in a very effective way.
    3-Good-Criteria met in a competent and an effective fashion.
    2-Satisfactory-Criteria met, but with considerable room for improvement.
    1-Minimally Acceptable-Criteria met to some extent.
    0-Not Evident-Criteria not met.

     


    Previous Page| Prev | TOC | Next |Next Page

    ©Copyright 1997All Rights Reserved. Curriculum Branch.
    Maintained by: Resource Sciences Coordinator

    Revised: January 27, 1999

      BC Ministry of Education Home Page