Sample 4 - Grade 12
Topic: Factors Affecting Forest Fire Management
Prescribed Learning Outcomes:
Fire Management
It is expected that students will:
- assess the role of fire in the forest ecosystem
- analyse causes of and prevention methods for forest fires
- identify factors that influence fire behaviour
- describe the social, economic, and ecological effects of fire suppression
- explain how prescribed burns can be used to achieve forest management objectives
In addition to these outcomes, the teacher assessed the students' group and communication skills.
Overview
The teacher planned a series of lessons to assist students in identifying the causes, influencing factors, and impact of fire in a forest. Students also learned about prescribed burns as part of forest management and fire control and suppression techniques. Throughout the unit, the teacher focussed on students' abilities to effectively communicate to others their knowledge of fire management. Evaluation was based on:
- fire-management plans
- debates
- technical manuals
Planning for Assessment and Evaluation
Research
- The teacher took students to see a display of equipment used to fight forest fires and view an instructional video on fighting forest fires. The teacher then assigned pairs of students to research and present more-detailed information to the class on specific tools or forest fire control and suppression methods. Students were encouraged to make their presentations interactive and to include samples, models, and audio-visual aides as appropriate. Before beginning the research projects, the class developed criteria for the presenters, audience, and teacher to use when assessing presentations.
Developing Fire-Management Plans
- After reviewing factors that influence fire behaviour and forest fire control and suppression methods, students visited a number of local forest sites. They evaluated each site for fire hazards and then developed management plans. The management plans included recommendations for appropriate forest fire prevention, control, and suppression methods.
- Students worked in small groups to plan responses to a hypothetical forest fire situation. First they assessed the fire site using maps, air photos, and weather information. The groups then determined the probable cause of the fire; its anticipated intensity, direction, and rate of spread; and the potential environmental and economic impact. Based on this data, each group developed a fire management plan and presented it to the class. A visiting forester provided students with comments on the completeness and feasibility of their plans.
Debating
- To review the format of a formal debate, the teacher provided students with the following guide:
Pro Team (A)
1. Introductory comments
3. Defense (pro reasons)
5. Questions for team B about their reasons
7. Answers to team B's questions
9. Summary of position
Con Team (B)
2. Introductory comments
4. Rebut (con reasons)
6. Answers to team A's questions
8. Questions for team A about their reasons
10. Summary of position
Groups of students then developed and presented debates based on fire management topics such as:
- "Fire is part of a forest's natural ecosystem and, as such, should not be managed by humans."
- "Forest management strategies that reduce the risks of undesired forest fires are cost-effective."
The teacher developed a rating scale to assess the debate presentations.
Developing Technical Manuals
Students worked in small groups and applied what they had learned in class, from guest speakers, and from personal research to develop short technical manuals on fire management procedures or pieces of equipment. Students discussed and agreed upon the following task requirements and criteria:
- 5 to 10 pages in length
- must include some graphics (may be borrowed)
- assume the audience is new to the material
- may include a limited amount (maximum 20%) of borrowed material
- draft copy must include editing comments from at least two other students and must be submitted with final copy
- final copy must be produced using a word-processing program
Defining the Criteria
Fire Management Plans
To what extent do students:
- identify factors influencing fire behaviour (e.g., wind, temperature, rainfall, humidity, fuel, terrain)
- identify and analyse causes of forest fires such as human activity (industrial or recreational) or lightning strikes
- explain the possible short- and long-term effects of a forest fire on the ecosystem, local economy, and residents of an area
- explain what forestry objectives can be achieved using prescribed burns
- analyse the site requirements and recommend appropriate and cost-effective fire management solutions
Debate
To what extent does the group:
- participate effectively
- clearly state and maintain a position
- provide evidence to support a position taken
- organize ideas clearly
- listen to opponent's position and refer to it
- demonstrate interest and enthusiasm
Technical Manual
To what extent does the group:
- create an effective technical manual that:
- is complete
- uses appropriate format and conventions
- is logical and precise
- is accurate
- uses language in an efficient and concise manner
- use electronic technologies to revise, edit, and format written communications
- evaluate the effectiveness of their own and others' technical manuals
Assessing and Evaluating Student Performance
The teacher observed as students participated in whole-class and small-group activities, taking note of behaviours that indicated whether they were achieving the criteria established for the unit. The teacher evaluated the quality of questions students asked and listened when they participated in discussions. While students worked in the classroom or on site, the teacher circulated, asking questions to probe their understanding of the concepts presented in the unit.
The teacher also provided students with the learning outcomes for the unit and had them work in small groups to each develop two test questions for each outcome. Groups then exchanged tests and completed them.
Fire Management Plans
The teacher assessed students' fire management plans by conducting student conferences. The teacher also used the reference sets Evaluating Problem Solving Across Curriculum and Evaluating Group Communication Skills Across Curriculum to assess the group presentations.
Debate
The teacher used a rating scale to evaluate each group's debating performance. The teacher provided feedback to students during group conferences and discussed with them ways they could improve their debating skills in the future.
Technical Manuals
Students used a rating scale to evaluate their own manuals and those of others. Any rating of 1 or 2 had to include specific recommendations for improvement.
Debate
| Criteria |
Rating |
|
clearly states and maintains position taken on the fire management issue
|
5 4 3 2 1 0 |
|
defends position with evidence
|
5 4 3 2 1 0 |
|
organizes ideas so others can understand them
|
5 4 3 2 1 0 |
|
listens to opponent's position and responds with reference to it
|
5 4 3 2 1 0 |
|
speaks clearly
|
5 4 3 2 1 0 |
|
shows interest and enthusiasm through voice/gesture
|
5 4 3 2 1 0 |
Key:
5-Excellent-Criteria met to an exceptional or unusual degree.
4-Very Good-Criteria met in a very effective way.
3-Good-Criteria met in a competent and an effective fashion.
2-Satisfactory-Criteria met, but with considerable room for improvement.
1-Minimally Acceptable-Criteria met to some extent.
0-Not Evident-Criteria not met.
Technical Manual
| Criteria | Comments | Rating |
|---|
|
complete (meets all task requirements)
|
|
5 4 3 2 1 0 |
|
follows appropriate format and conventions (integrates visual and written information effectively)
|
|
5 4 3 2 1 0 |
|
clear and precise (logical sequence; clear language; effective use of index, table of contents, titles to help reader)
|
|
5 4 3 2 1 0 |
|
accurate (all needed steps and materials are correctly identified and described)
|
|
5 4 3 2 1 0 |
|
efficient (concise, focussed, efficient in language and content, organized to allow for selective and rapid access to information)
|
|
5 4 3 2 1 0 |
|
presentation (professional in appearance and meets a high standard for legibility)
|
|
5 4 3 2 1 0 |
Key:
5-Excellent-Criteria met to an exceptional or unusual degree.
4-Very Good-Criteria met in a very effective way.
3-Good-Criteria met in a competent and an effective fashion.
2-Satisfactory-Criteria met, but with considerable room for improvement.
1-Minimally Acceptable-Criteria met to some extent.
0-Not Evident-Criteria not met.
Previous Page
Next Page
©Copyright 1997All Rights Reserved. Curriculum Branch.
Maintained by: Resource Sciences Coordinator
Revised: January 27, 1999
BC Ministry of Education Home Page