International Languages Icon Sample 4: Grade 8

Topic: Planning a Trip to India 

Prescribed Learning Outcomes

Interpersonal Communication 

It is expected that students will:

Informational Communication

It is expected that students will:

Overview

Students were involved in a series of activities related to planning a trip to India. Evaluation was based on:

Planning for Assessment and Evaluation

Defining the Criteria

The teacher reviewed the prescribed learning outcomes, and explained the requirements of each task. Together, the teacher and students developed the following key criteria.

Oral Presentation of Travel Itinerary

Overall Group Itinerary

Individual Presentations Prepared Dialogue Journal Entries and Postcards Assessing and Evaluating Student Performance

The teacher evaluated demonstrations of the prescribed learning outcomes using the following rating scales and checklists. Students had copies of the criteria and rating scales as they worked.

Oral Presentation of Travel Itinerary

During each oral presentation, three students were designated to provide peer feedback using the same rating format the teacher used.

 

Overall Group Itinerary

Rating Criteria
3
  • Itinerary follows a logical sequence and reasonably estimates times and practical limits. Visual aids are used, including a clear, accurate map of the entire itinerary. Illustrations of some stops are included.
  • 2
  • Itinerary follows a logical sequence. Estimates of times and practical considerations may show inconsistencies. Includes a clear and accurate map.
  • 1
  • Itinerary may not follow a logical sequence. Time estimates and other practical considerations may be ignored. Includes a map.
  • 0
  • Incomplete or inappropriate.
  •  

    Individual Presentations

    Criteria Rating Comments
  • understandable
  •    
  • based on accurate information
  •    
  • includes relevant, interesting details
  •    
  • speaks fluidly, with most pauses at the end of a phrase or sentence
  •    
  • answers most peer questions and provides relevant information
  •    
  • uses a variety of vocabulary and language structures
  •    

    Key:

    ST - Strong
    SA - Satisfactory
    ME - Minimal
    NE - Not Evident

     

    Prepared Dialogue

    Criteria Rating Comments
  • includes relevant and accurate details
  •    
  • demonstrates clear interaction with partner and contributes to team performance
  •    
  • speaks fluidly, with most pauses at the end of a phrase or sentence
  •    
  • uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary and language structures
  •    
  • follows appropriate conventions for situations and relationships (e.g., greeting a grandparent
  •    

    Key:

    5 - Strong
    Criteria fully and easily demonstrated

    4 - Component
    Criteria demonstrated, may need occasional support

    3 - Developing
    Criteria partially demonstrated

    2- Limited
    Some evidence of criteria

    1 - Not Evident

    This rating scale can be used by the teacher, and by students for peer assessments and self-assessments.

     

    Journal Entries and Postcards

    Rating Criteria
    Excellent
  • message is relevant and appropriate; includes interesting details and features
  • meaning is clear; errors occur in letter formations, word choices, and so on, but do not interfere with meaning
  • takes risks; uses a variety of expressions and structures including some that have not been practised in class (and consequently may not be used appropriately)
  • Good
  • message is relevant and appropriate; includes some interesting details
  • meaning is clear with some effort on the part of the reader; errors in letter formations, word choices, language structures, and so on do not obscure meaning
  • uses a variety of vocabulary and language structures practised in class
  • Acceptable
  • message is relevant and appropriate; includes few details
  • reader can understand most of the message with some effort; errors in letter formation, word choice, and so on, occasionally obscure meaning
  • uses a variety of vocabulary and language structures practised in class
  • Not Demonstrated
  • criteria for acceptable performance were not evident
  • Communicating meaning is the most important consideration and should receive the greatest weighting when assigning a grade.


    | Prev | TOC | Next |

    © Copyright 1996. All Rights Reserved. Curriculum Branch.
    Maintained by: International Languages Coordinator

    Revised: January 26, 1999

      BC Ministry of Education Home Page