Physical Education IRP

Physical Education
Appendix D: Assessment and Evaluation - Examples



Examples of Assessment and Evaluation in Physical Education

Physical education is an integrated program; assessment and evaluation should therefore reflect outcomes in all three curriculum organizers. For example, while evaluating Movement skills and concepts, teachers should also evaluate learning outcomes from Active Living and Personal and Social Responsibility.

Consistent feedback is particularly important to the successful development of good motor skills, and to the development of a positive and enthusiastic attitude toward lifelong physical activity. Helping students set goals and objectives for their own physical development and healthy lifestyle choices, and then working with them to monitor their progress, is an important responsibility of all physical education teachers.

Assessment should be carried out in a variety of ways in the various environments which are a feature of the curriculum. Students particularly benefit when they participate in developing the assessment criteria. Tools and techniques include:

The following examples show how some of these tools and techniques might be used in the classroom.


Grades K to 1

Organizers: Movement (Games), Personal and Social Responsibility

Topic: Manipulative Skills

Prescribed Learning Outcomes:

Movement (Games)

It is expected that students will:

Personal and Social Responsibility

It is expected that students will:

Planning for Assessment

Students had the opportunity to work with a variety of equipment, play games, and practise moving safely while participating in movement activities. The students practised throwing and catching skills with different equipment, using scarves, beanbags, balls, and then hoops to develop hand-eye co-ordination. They practised simple throwing and catching sequences, individually, against the wall, and with a partner. The teacher gave the students the opportunity to work with different partners and equipment to play simple co-operative games. The teacher asked the students, on an ongoing basis, what safe and responsible would look and sound like. The teacher and students discussed safety and posted the information on a chart. The teacher encouraged students to illustrate the items on the chart. Students practised taking out, playing with, and returning equipment safely and appropriately. The students created an individual and partner challenge which they demonstrated for the class.

Defining Criteria

The teacher and students worked together to establish the criteria and posted it for the students on a chart called the Student Rating Sheet.

Movement

To what extent do students:

Personal and Social Responsibility

To what extent do students:

Assessing and Evaluating Student Performance

The teacher guided the students through a self-evaluation sheet for safety by reading aloud the criteria from their chart. Students circled I remembered or I forgot on their Student Rating Sheet as the teacher reviewed the list.

The teacher observed the students' challenges and demonstrations, noting the development of skills as outlined in the movement criteria.

The teacher discussed the observations with each student in an informal conference. Students decided on one thing they would like to work on next time, and recorded a personal goal on the Student Rating Sheet. The teacher also rated student behaviour using the Primary Student Responsibility Scale included at the end of this appendix.


Grades 2 to 3

Organizers: Movement (Individual and Dual Activities, Games), Active Living, Personal and Social Responsibility

Topic: Juggling

Prescribed Learning Outcomes:

Movement

It is expected that students will:

Personal and Social Responsibility

It is expected that students will:

Active Living

It is expected that students will:

Planning for Assessment

Through demonstration and instruction, students were given specific examples of ways to send and receive an object using various body parts and implements. For example, the teacher explained, demonstrated, and highlighted examples of the tossing technique:

When working with two scarves, the next scarf is released across the body when the first scarf reaches its peak.

The teacher provided opportunities for students to practise holding, throwing, and catching one and two scarves using the tossing technique.

In small groups, students used two or three beanbags and practised team juggling skills. Using the underhand throw, students began with one bag and threw in a designated pattern to one person in the circle until everyone had thrown to another person; then additional beanbags were added one at a time, keeping all of them moving from person to person in the group without dropping them.

Defining Criteria

To what extent do students:

Assessing and Evaluating Student Performance

The teacher gave the students the opportunity, when they felt ready, to demonstrate their ability to send and receive the scarves while keeping control. The teacher used the list of criteria as the outline for a comment sheet. Teacher and students conferenced about their progress.

Students assessed their partner's performance and completed a checklist on the criteria for holding, throwing, and catching two scarves.

Partner Checklist

Partner's Name:

My partner demonstrates:

YesNo
tossing the scarf straight up in line with the body
catching the scarf using a clawing motion
tossing the second scarf when the first scarf reaches its peak
tossing and catching while remaining stationary
releasing the second scarf across the body
working in a smooth and even rhythm

Students also completed a journal, recording their individual progress in acquiring the tossing technique.

Personal Journal

Date of Entry:


This is what I was trying to do . . .
This is how I feel about it . . .
This is what I am able to do . . .
This is what I would like to be able to do . . .
This is what you can do to help me . . .

In addition, the teacher periodically noted observations about the students' self-confidence, progress in acquiring the skills, and evidence that they were enjoying the physical activity. This information contributed to the written structured report for each student.


Grade 4

Organizers: Movement (Gymnastics), Personal and Social Responsibility

Topic: Balance and Travel

Prescribed Learning Outcomes:

Movement

It is expected that students will:

Personal and Social Responsibility

It is expected that students will:

Planning for Assessment

The teacher reviewed safe use of gymnastic equipment and the positive-behaviour expectations with students. Students worked individually on mats practising rolls, balances, and various gymnastic skills related to the themes of travel and balance. Students made pyramids or statues by balancing on one, two, three, and four points at different levels. Students created three-or-four part sequences incorporating locomotor movements in different directions and balances at different levels, matching or mirroring their partners' movements.

The students reviewed movement concepts and skills such as:

The instruction followed a progression within each of the themes. The students worked on the floor and with small equipment to explore balance positions and specific gymnastic skills, such as headstands, stork stands, rolling, and V-sit. The teacher set up stations which included small and large apparatus such as benches, climbing frame, beat board, box, hoops, and mats. Task cards were used to outline movement challenges related to the themes.

As a culminating activity, students created a partner sequence to present to the class. Students used the criteria to assess and evaluate each other's sequences. Students collected feedback from class members and incorporated it into their sequence prior to the final presentation.

Defining Criteria

To what extent do students:

The teacher discussed the criteria with the students and illustrated different levels of performance. The teacher designed a performance scale based on the above criteria and discussions with the students. Students performed their sequences for members of the class. The performance scale was used to assess and evaluate the students' sequences. Students built the feedback into their sequence for the final class demonstration. The teacher assessed the students using the performance scale. Each student completed a self-assessment and conferenced with the teacher.

Performance Scale

5--The partners demonstrated a dynamic, superbly choreographed sequence which included all necessary aspects of body awareness, space awareness, qualities, and relationships. Each element in the sequence linked smoothly to the next, and correct form and technique were displayed. Small and large apparatus were used safely and the selection of elements worked very well. The partners successfully fulfilled their responsibilities in the sequence and the overall presentation was outstanding. The students accepted the challenge willingly, were motivated to solve the challenge, and were engaged until completion.

4--The performance was well thought-out and included all necessary aspects of body awareness, space awareness, qualities, and relationships. Movements on the apparatus were demonstrated with care. The partners used the apparatus well with good technique for each of the elements in the sequence. Some changes to the flow and timing of the elements would make the sequence smoother.

3--The sequence included most aspects of the criteria outlined. The performance moved along with some pauses. The partners worked co-operatively. Timing in choreographing the sequence and correct techniques are still developing.

2--The partners encountered some difficulty with the design and execution of the sequence. They required support from the teacher and peers. Some criteria were not addressed and the timing and flow of the sequence was erratic.

1--The demonstration lacked thoughtful planning. Most of the criteria for the sequence was not incorporated appropriately. The partners lacked the communication skills needed to fulfill each of their responsibilities for performing the sequence.


Grade 5

Organizers: Movement (Games), Personal and Social Responsibility

Topic: Throwing and Catching

Prescribed Learning Outcomes:

Movement

It is expected that students will:

Personal and Social Responsibility

It is expected that students will:

Planning for Assessment

To develop striking skills, students worked individually, with a partner, and in small groups with a variety of small equipment. Students practised their sending, projecting, and receiving skills using sticks, bats, balls, paddles, and racquets. Students worked in small groups to practise striking an object with an implement (e.g., hockey sticks and puck, paddles, and whiffle balls). Students worked with partners and small groups to create challenges. The teacher observed the students and encouraged them to modify (make it easier) or extend (make it more difficult) the task by changing factors that affect the performance of motor skills.

Factors that affect motor skills:

Students were put into "challenge situations" with a partner and were asked to modify or extend without the teacher's assistance. The teacher observed and questioned students while they were working. The teacher videotaped the students participating in the challenge situations. Students reviewed the video and participated in the assessment of their performance.

Defining Critieria

The criteria were defined by the teacher through class discussions.

To what extent do students:

Assessing and Evaluating Student Performance

The teacher observed the performance on the video and evaluated the student using the above criteria and the following rating scale.

Rating Scale

4--All criteria were met; the challenges were unique and showed critical thinking at an exceptionally high level.

3-- All criteria were fully met.

2--Most criteria were met; the student performance was safe but the challenges lacked evidence of critical thinking.

1--Some criteria were met but there was evidence that the student requires more practise.

In partners, the students viewed the video and recorded evidence on a Thinking Paper using the following statements:

The teacher collected the Thinking Papers, conferenced with the students, and used the student reflections to set student goals for physical education. In addition, the teacher used the Evaluating Problem Solving Across Curriculum reference set to assess the students level of engagement.


Grade 6

Organizers: Active Living, Movement (Dance), Personal and Social Responsibility

Topic: Multicultural Dance

Prescribed Learning Outcomes:

Active Living

It is expected that students will:

Movement

It is expected that students will:

Personal and Social Responsibility

It is expected that students will:

Planning for Assessment

The teacher and students discussed the role of dance as a physical activity for life. The students reviewed a previously learned dance and then practised a variety of folk dances from different cultures. With partners and in groups, the students modified and created steps within their dance. The students planned a presentation using the following process:

  1. Brainstorm steps, record ideas, create a dance.
  2. Prepare and practise new or modified dance (e.g., La Bastringue).
  3. Prepare oral introduction to dance.
  4. Stage a dress rehearsal for self- or peer evaluation.
  5. Incorporate feedback and refine the presentation.
  6. Present the dance to an audience.

Defining Criteria

The teacher and students collaborated to establish the criteria.

To what extent do students:

Assessing and Evaluating Student Performance

The teacher developed a performance scale based on the above criteria. Discussions were held to ensure that all students understood the expectations. The performance scale was used by the students for the purpose of peer assessment and evaluation during the dress rehearsal and by the teacher to assess and evaluate the final presentations. Each group was responsible for peer assessment of another group. The teacher encouraged group consensus and fair judgments for each rating.

Performance Scale

5--All members of the group worked together co-operatively to plan their dance. There is evidence that they followed the process for creating the dance. Dance modifications were innovative and showed a great deal of thought. The tempo of the music and the steps matched perfectly. The group was able to implement feedback from the teacher and their peers. The performance flowed smoothly and was presented with poise and confidence.

4--The group worked well together. There was evidence that they followed the process for planning a dance. They were able to take some of the suggestions and implement them. The steps and the tempo matched. The combination of dance steps usually flowed smoothly and the dancers usually appeared poised and confident.

3-- The group worked well together but at times required support from the teacher. The dance process appeared to be followed and the group included some suggestions from other groups. The combination of dance steps was complete but more practice was needed to create a smoother dance composition. At times the dancers seemed poised and confident.

2--The group had difficulty working together. They had a hard time deciding what they wanted to do. The dance was complete and was presented, but the tempo did not always match and it lacked innovative ideas. The dancers lacked poise and confidence. The dance required more practice.

1--The group had difficulty working together. The group was not prepared to present a dance.

In their journals, students were asked to reflect on their personal contribution to the dance and the work of their group.


Grade 7

Organizers: Active Living, Movement (Individual and Dual Activities), Personal and Social Responsibility

Topic: Training Program

Prescribed Learning Outcomes:

Active Living

It is expected that students will:

Movement

It is expected that students will:

Personal and Social Responsibility

It is expected that students will:

Planning for Assessment

The teacher provided opportunities for the students to participate in warm-up activities, stretching, strength training, and cool-down activities related to various activities from the individual and dual movement category. The activities incorporated fitness components such as strength, flexibility, and cardiovascular endurance. Students had an opportunity to work on their personal fitness level through aerobic and anaerobic activities (e.g., running, walking, skipping, aerobic dance, stretching, jumping, strength activities, isometric exercises) and to participate in activities related to track and field and combatives (e.g., wrestling, karate, and individual manipulatives). The students planned a training program to address their needs and interests. The teacher outlined activities, an appropriate time frame for training, and specific fitness components that should be included in a training program.

The following steps were used to create a small training circuit:

  1. Students participated in a circuit incorporating aerobic and anaerobic activities (e.g., bench jumping, pushups, skipping, sit-ups, pylon weave) and various tasks related to activities from the individual and dual movement category.

  2. Students, in small groups, designed a similar circuit following the specific task requirements given by the teacher (e.g., three aerobic and three anaerobic activities, map of circuit, one activity of their choice and list of instructions for each station). The selection was based on student assessment of needs related to developing their personal functional level of physical fitness.

  3. In a large space (e.g., field or activity room) students set up and used their own stations to determine the functionality of the circuit.

  4. Each group tested and evaluated their circuit, using other groups as participants.

  5. The class evaluated the various circuits, deciding on the most efficient, practical, and enjoyable circuit(s) that also met the criteria.

  6. The group incorporated the feedback and evaluation to revise and modify their circuit.

Defining the Criteria

The teacher and students worked together to establish the criteria.

To what extent do students:

Assessing and Evaluating Student Performance

Each group explained their circuit to the class, explaining their choice of activities, the application of fitness principles, and how the personal fitness levels will improve using the circuit. The group demonstrated the three aerobic and three anaerobic activities showing specific motor skills and body mechanics and incorporated tasks or activities that address their personal functional level of physical fitness. The teacher used the above criteria and the following scale to record observations on the students' performance.

Rating Scale:

4--All criteria were fully met; explanation and demonstration were thorough; all elements were present and expertly demonstrated; worked together to encourage others; followed required steps; selected appropriate activities or tasks to meet fitness goals.

3-- Criteria were met; explanation and demonstration were complete; most elements were present and adequately demonstrated; evidence that students effectively worked together.

2--A variety of activities were present, but did not include all criteria; explanation and demonstration were limited; selection of tasks or activities to address personal fitness goals could be modified; students needed some assistance from the teacher to encourage each other and to work co-operatively.

1-- Limited activities; no explanation; inadequate demonstration (more time required to establish an effective group, create an adequate circuit, and practise the skills).

The Student Responsibility Scale was also used to evaluate individual work in Personal and Social Responsibility.

In addition, the students submitted a self- or group evaluation sheet outlining: each group member's contribution and how they assisted each other; three things they thought were effective in their circuit; the personal fitness goal for each member of the group; and a suggestion for improvement.


Previous Page Next Page

Table of Contents

Province of British Columbia
Ministry of Education
Curriculum Branch © 1995 Copyright

Maintained by: Physical Education Coordinator

Revised: March 1996

Ministry of Education Home Page