Music Icon

Appendix D: Evaluation Example

The following are Evaluation Example Topics for Grade 10:

Preparation for a Concert Performance
Jazz Improvisation
Music History
Sight-Reading in Context in a Performing Ensemble (band, choir, strings)


Grade 10

Topic: Preparation for a Concert Performance

Prescribed Learning Outcomes

Structure

It is expected that students will:

Context

It is expected that students will:

Planning for Assessment and Evaluation

This sample shows the evaluation of students in an orchestra as they prepared for and performed a concert. The same approach would work for any performance group, such as a band or choir.

Defining the Criteria

Assessment criteria were developed by the class, working in conjunction with their teacher.

Group Performance

To what extent does the group:

Group Project

To what extent do the individual and the group:

Journal

To what extent does the student:

Assessing and Evaluating Student Performance

The teacher developed a performance scale based on the criteria to assess and evaluate students' group performances, projects, and journal entries.

Group Performance and Group Project Scale

Rhythmic accuracy, tempo, and note precision are excellent, and flaws, if any, are minor and quickly corrected. Tone quality is well focussed, full, open, resonant, and consistent. Articulation is consistent and uniform. Phrasing is always natural and uniformly performed by all sections in clear, meaningful, and expressive ways. Superior use of musical techniques creates a sensitive, effective, and naturally communicated artistic performance. A thorough and stylistically valid interpretation is communicated throughout the performance. Concentration is superior, showing evidence that changes have been incorporated, and creating an extremely solid, polished performance. A relationship with the audience is apparent and well developed.

Rhythm, tempo, and notes are accurate. Excellent tone is achieved most of the time, and lapses and problems are infrequent and usually occur during more demanding musical passages. Articulation is well developed and uniform, with weakness demonstrated by individuals only during complex passages. Phrasing is thorough and natural most of the time. There is a good demonstration of the skills needed to transcend mechanical and technical aspects, creating artistic results most of the time. Interpretation is good, uniform, and meaningful. Some passages may be lacking in interpretation but do not detract considerably from an otherwise excellent performance. Players attempt to incorporate changes. Commitment to the group is evident. Rehearsals are attended regularly, and assigned roles and tasks are completed. Concentration is excellent. Players respond well to the director and demonstrate a relationship with the audience.

Rhythm and notes are performed accurately most of the time, with problems occurring within finer details of more complex patterns and structures. Tone quality is usually good, with uniform colour and texture demonstrated in less demanding passages. Articulation is good most of the time, but may not be consistent. Complex articulations lack clarity and control. Phrasing is basic, uniform, and consistent some of the time, but not always natural. Interpretation is meaningful and uniform some of the time, but style may be rigid and mechanical. Concentration is good but occasionally inconsistent, and few changes have been incorporated. Rehearsals are usually attended, and assigned roles and tasks are usually completed. Players pay attention to the director most of the time. A relationship with the audience is not always apparent.

Rhythm and notes are performed accurately in simple passages, with frequent rhythmic inconsistencies. A basic understanding of tonal quality concepts is not yet developed throughout the ensemble. Articulation is correct some of the time. Phrasing is mostly mechanical and non-musical. Some attempts are made at altering dynamics, but with limited range. There is little communication of musical ideas, and no attempt is made to conduct self-evaluations or to incorporate changes. Rehearsals are attended sporadically, and assigned roles and tasks are not fully completed. Concentration seems to drift. A relationship with the audience is lacking.

Journals

Demonstrates in-depth understanding and clarity of thought. Comments about the large and small groups show insight and objectivity. Insights into personal performances and contributions are reflective and include goals for improvement. Student is able to define skills and talents and their benefits in career and life choices.

Demonstrates some depth of understanding, but is somewhat vague. Analyses of large group and small group work are objective. Insights into personal performances and contributions contain suggestions for improvement. Student does not always accurately define personal skills but does see how acquiring skills and talents will benefit career and life choices.

Demonstrates little depth of understanding. Personal connections are not apparent. Thoughts and feelings are on a surface level. Comments about the large and small groups do not show depth of analysis. Student is not sure how to improve personal performance and does not see connections between skills learned and career and life choices.


Grade 10

Topic: Jazz Improvisation

Prescribed Learning Outcomes

Structure

It is expected that students will:

Thoughts, Images, and Feelings

It is expected that students will:

Context

It is expected that students will:

Planning for Assessment and Evaluation

The students in this sample were enrolled in a stage band course and had previous experience with their instruments. The same approach would work with any jazz-based performance course.

Defining the Criteria

Scales

To what extent does the student:

Student Performance­Riffs and Improvised Solos

To what extent does the student:

Journals and Listening Logs

To what extent does the student:

Assessing and Evaluating Student Performance

The teacher developed a technical and expressive rating scale for students' performances of the scales, a double-sided rating scale for the rhythmic and melodic patterns in the performances of riffs and improvised solos, and a scale for the interpretation of music recorded in their listening logs.

Technical Skills
(Accurate notes, rhythms, articulation.)
Rating
  • notes
 
  • rhythms
 
  • articulation
 
Key:

 

Expressive Interpretation
(Subtle nuances in dynamics, intonation, and phrasing.)
Rating
  • dynamics
 
  • intonation
 
  • phrasing
 
Key:

 

Improvised Riffs and SolosRating
  • uses a variety of rhythmic patterns
 
  • uses identifiable melodic patterns
 
Key:

Thoughts, Images, and Feelings Scale

clearly expresses thoughts, images, and feelings; uses the principles of design with a variety of elements of expression; demonstrates creativity­creates a unique and personal product; product shows the extensive use of subtle nuances in dynamics and phrasing

vaguely expresses thoughts, images, and feelings; uses the principles of design with some elements of expression; demonstrates some creativity­creates a predictable product with unique elements; product shows some use of subtle nuances in dynamics and phrasing

doesn't express thoughts, images, and feelings; demonstrates little use of the principles of design with elements of expression; demonstrates little creativity­creates a predictable product; product shows little or no subtle nuances in dynamics and phrasing

Listening Logs

demonstrates in-depth understanding and clarity of thought; uses supporting evidence from the music in ways that convince and offer new insights; uses a variety of music terms to describe the music; gives extensive examples of riffs and melodic patterns, with personal responses to these examples

demonstrates some depth of understanding, but is somewhat vague when explaining analyses; uses supporting evidence from the music to represent thinking; uses common music terms to describe the music; gives some examples of riffs and melodic patterns

demonstrates little depth of understanding and is unclear when explaining analyses; finds limited support for ideas from the music; uses music vocabulary occasionally to describe the music; gives examples of riffs and melodic patterns


Grade 10

Topic: Music History

Prescribed Learning Outcomes

Structure

It is expected that students will:

Thoughts, Images, and Feelings

It is expected that students will:

Context

It is expected that students will:

Planning for Assessment and Evaluation

Defining the Criteria

Timeline

To what extent does the student:

Group Performance and Research Project

To what extent does the student:

Assessing and Evaluating Student Performance

The teacher applied the criteria to the timeline, the group performance, and the research project.

TimelineRating
  • identifies characteristics of the elements of music for each of the major style periods
 
  • identifies the characteristics and qualities of the style period from listening examples
 
  • identifies the important historical and social issues for each of the major style periods
 
  • makes connections among events, issues, and contexts, and reflects on the influence they had on the music and the musicians of the day
 
  • uses appropriate music terms to describe the style period
 

Key:

Performance and Research Project

Outstanding
The performance or project analysis is complete, accurate, and demonstrates a thorough understanding of the characteristics and elements of the style period. The events and their relationship to the music are identified. Linkages to the historical and social contexts are clear and explicit. The performance or project insightfully describes the thoughts, feelings, and images reflected in the music, and uses many music terms appropriately and in ways that contribute to the description of the music. Music chosen to represent the period is not only representative of the period but clearly communicates the intended message. The incorporation of the other fine arts, costumes, dance, and visual arts is closely matched and enhances the performance or project. The performance or project is unique and original.

Good
The performance or project analysis is complete, accurate, and demonstrates understanding of the major characteristics and elements of the style period. Events and their relationship to the music are identified, and there are attempts to clearly link the music and the historical and social contexts. The performance or project describes the thoughts, feelings, and images in the music and appropriately uses several music terms to describe the music. Music chosen to represent the period is representative. The incorporation of the other fine arts, costumes, dance, and visual arts enhances the performance or project.

Satisfactory
The performance or project analysis is complete but contains some inaccuracies. A basic understanding of the major characteristics and elements of the style period is demonstrated. Events and their relationship to the music are identified, but no or few attempts are made to clearly link the music and the historical and social contexts. The performance or project describes, in a vague fashion, the thoughts, feelings, and images reflected in the music, and uses some music terms inappropriately to describe the music. Music chosen to represent the period is representative. The other fine arts are incorporated, but not always in a way that enhances the performance or project.


Grade 10

Topic: Sight-Reading in Context in a Performing Ensemble (band, choir, strings)

Prescribed Learning Outcomes

Structure

It is expected that students will:

Planning for Assessment and Evaluation

Students in this sample had previous music experience with their instruments or voices.

Defining the Criteria

Individual Performance

To what extent does the student:

Ensemble Selections

To what extent does the group:

Assessing and Evaluating Student Performance

The teacher developed a performance rating scale to assess and evaluate performances.

Skill and Expressive Interpretation

Individual Performance
Rating
  • sight-reads material with accuracy in:

    • notes, including key signatures and accidentals
  •  
    • rhythms
     
    • dynamics
     
    • articulation
     
    • phrasing
     
    Ensemble Selections
  • performs notes accurately
  •  
  • performs in tune as an ensemble
  •  
  • achieves clarity of tone
  •  
  • creates tonal balance and blend, both within and between sections
  •  
  • identifies and performs the basic structure (e.g., repeats, codas)
        accurately
  •  
  • identifies and performs technically demanding sections, key changes,
        and metre changes with control
  •  
  • creates cohesive sounds, showing control of pulse, tempo,
        and rhythmic patterns
  •  
  • performs articulations consistently and with uniformity
  •  
  • uses musical techniques to create a sensitive, effective, and artistic
        performance
  •  
  • communicates musical ideas using artistic subtleties
  •  

    Key:


    Previous Page Next Page

    Table of Contents

    Province of British Columbia
    Ministry of Education
    Standards Department

    © 1995 Copyright

    Maintained by: Fine Arts Coordinator - Music

    Revised: January 3, 1996

    Ministry of Education Home Page