Technology Education IRPAppendix D: Assessment and Evaluation - Samples
Sample 10: Calculus 12


Topic: Limits

Prescribed Learning Outcomes:

Problem Solving

It is expected that students will:

Functions, Graphs and Limits (Limits)

It is expected that students will:

In addition to these outcomes, the teacher assessed outcomes related to the historical development of calculus, students' attitudes, and group and communication skills.

Unit focus

The concept of a limit plays a central role in students future understanding of the importance and usefulness calculus. It is this understanding that enables students to effectively interpret the results of a variety of problem solutions using calculus.

Planning the Unit

To plan the unit, the teacher:

The Unit

Introducing the Concept of Limit

One-sided Limits

Infinite Limits and Limits at Infinity

Asymptotes of a Function

Continuous Functions

Applying Knowledge of Limits

To encourage students to apply their knowledge of limits to solve some of the historical problems that the teacher had introduced at the beginning of the unit (i.e., tangent line problem and the area problem). Students worked in small groups to develop possible solutions to the problems.

Defining the Criteria

Mathematical Thinking

to what extent do students:

Attitudes

To what extent do students:

Group Skills

To what extent do students:

Communication Skills

To what extent do students:

Assessing and Evaluating Student Performance

Observation and Questioning

Students' understanding, attitudes, and group and communication skills were evaluated informally throughout the unit. The pace of the unit was determined in part by the speed with which students seemed to grasp the concepts.

The teacher:

Individual Projects

Each student completed a research project on an topic or mathematician of personal interest. The project required students to:

Presentations and reports were evaluated separately using the following holistic scale. Students received copies of the scale before starting the project and used it to rate their presentations and written reports. The teacher held conferences to discuss discrepancies between students' and teacher's ratings. Students were given suggestions for improvements. Students who received scores of one or two on their written reports were given the opportunity to redo them. The final score for the written report was the higher of the two scores.

Project Rating Scale

4 - Outstanding

Information is presented clearly, logically, and understandably. Examples or demonstrations are used appropriately to illustrate explanations. Findings are well organized and effectively displayed. Explanations indicate a clear understanding of the topic and the use of limits in a variety of contexts (e.g., to determine asymptotes of a function). References are appropriate for the topic and indicate that the student understands where to look for information.

3 - Adequate

The presentation indicates that the student has a basic understanding of the topic and of limits. Information is understandable. Findings are organized and displayed acceptably. References are appropriate for the Topic.

2 - Needs Improvement

The presentation indicates a limited understanding of either the topic or the use of limits, or both. The presentation may be illogical or difficult to follow. Findings may be organized poorly or ineffectively. References may indicate that the student is not clear on finding the best sources of information.

1 - Inadequate

The presentation indicates a lack of understanding of either the topic or the use of limits. The presentation is illogical and difficult to follow. Findings are poorly organized and ineffectively presented. References may be lacking or inappropriate for the topic.

Test/Team Competition

To evaluate students' understanding of the concepts developed in this unit, the teacher designed a team competition based on completing a set of items on a study sheet. Students worked in groups of four and used all available resources to answer each of the items. The groups were given opportunities to drill each other. When all members of the group felt comfortable with the information, they were asked to take a test individually that contained items similar to those on the study sheet. The teacher collected the tests, scored them, and gave each student a grade. Groups worked together to correct their tests and returned their corrections for additional points. The winning group had the highest average individual test scores and the highest average scores on their corrections.

Take-Home Test

Students were given a take-home test that contained similar problems to those studied during the unit. As part of the test, students were required to explain the rules they had learned for working with limits and use the rules to solve examples that illustrated their explanations.

The last page of the test included a self-evaluation sheet that asked the following questions:

The teacher used the results of the take-home test and students' responses to the self-evaluation to pair students for after-school peer tutoring. Students were required to correct errors on their take-home tests and resubmit them for a second evaluations.


Previous Page| Prev | TOC | Next |Next Page

© Copyright 2000 All Rights Reserved. Curriculum Branch.
Maintained by: Mathematics Coordinator

Revised: September 2001

  BC Ministry of Education Home Page