Sample 2: Grade 8
Topic: European Cities and Towns
Prescribed Learning Outcomes:
Communicating
It is expected that students will:
- participate in short conversations
- describe activities and interests in oral and written form
Acquiring Information
It is expected that students will:
- extract and to some extent process specific information from German-language resources to complete authentic tasks
- convey acquired information in oral, visual, and written forms
Overview
The teacher developed a three-week series of activities centred around European cities and towns. Evaluation of oral and written skills was based on role-play dialogues and tourist brochures of European cities.
Planning for Assessment and Evaluation
- Students studied German maps and brochures of cities and towns. They developed class charts of related vocabulary and discussed how the general layout of European cities differs from North American cities. Students reviewed previously learned vocabulary and expressions and used other resources (e.g., maps, brochures, dictionaries, and phrase books) to identify new language related to buildings and tourist attractions (der Hauptbahnhof, das Schloß, das Museum,
die Jugendherberge, die Kirche) and directions (an der Ampel, gehen Sie geradeaus, auf der linken Seite). The teacher recorded lists of useful vocabulary and sentence frames.
- Each student practised using some of the language by writing a list of five local buildings and sharing it with a partner. Students also practised giving instructions on how to get to one building from another.
- The teacher used written quizzes to check each student's knowledge of relevant vocabulary and grammatical structures.
- Students listened to taped dialogues in which native speakers asked for and provided directions to attractions or sights in a German-speaking city. (Entschuldigung, wie komme ich am besten zum Dom?) They responded to questions about what they heard, and added vocabulary and structures to the class charts.
- The teacher asked students, working in pairs or groups of three, to practise one-to-two-minute role plays using city maps from German, Swiss, or Austrian cities. In each group, a tourist was to ask a local resident for directions to an attraction or point
of interest (castle, museum, cathedral). The local resident would respond by
providing detailed directions. The students discussed criteria and a rating scale before they began practising.
- Students then presented their role plays to the class.
- Working alone or in pairs, students created models or posters of their own European-style cities, which included 6 to 10 different buildings. Students each included an accompanying brochure that provided basic information and directions to the various sights. Before they began, students discussed requirements for the brochure and agreed to include:
- a map showing the location of each building
- a brief description of each building (could be in point form) that includes name, purpose, location, and one or two key details (e.g., size, shape, age, key features, hours of operation)
- Students then used their cities and brochures to role-play tourist office conversations. They provided suggestions on what to see and do in their cities,
and on how to get to two of the main attractions. Each student had opportunities to be both tourist and local expert.
Defining the Criteria
As students worked on their assignments and practised their oral presentations,
the teacher outlined the requirements and discussed the following criteria.
Role Play: Giving Directions Using
City Maps
To what extent do students:
- extract accurate information from the map or other resources
- use appropriate question structures they have learned
- use simple, patterned phrases correctly to give directions
- sequence directions logically
- make themselves understood using German (approximate pronunciation
and intonation)
- show control of vocabulary and structures that have been practised (correct use
of articles, prepositions, pronouns)
- sustain the interaction (no long pauses interfere with the message being communicated)
- use intonation, miming, gestures, and body language to support communication
Brochure
To what extent does the brochure:
- provide all required information for the 6 to 10 buildings
- include relevant and interesting details appropriate to European cities
- include appropriate labels on the map
- use appropriate vocabularyspelled correctly and including capitals, articles, pronouns, and prepositions (zum/zur)
- reproduce German words and patterns in understandable form
- show appropriate organization of information
Role Play: Tourist Office
To what extent is the student able to:
- provide a comprehensible message
- include some understandable detail (e.g., directions, adjectives, adverbs)
- recognize and respond to simple questions and statements
- use appropriate patterns and frames to include known expressions and vocabulary
- sustain the use of German throughout the activity
- use intonation, miming, gestures, and body language to support communication
Assessing and Evaluating
Student Performance
The teacher used performance rating scales to evaluate students' work in this
unit. Students were given copies of the rating scales and samples of projects completed previously. The rating scales were discussed in English before students began working
on their assignments. For the tourist brochures, students included self-assessments with their work. For the tourist office role plays, each student was scored individually.
Role Play: Giving Directions Using City Maps
| Criteria | Self-Assessment | Teacher Rating |
| Student 1 | Student 2 | Student 1 | Student 2 |
- extracts accurate information from the map or other resources
- uses appropriate question structures that have been learned
- uses simple, patterned phrases correctly to give directions
- sequences directions logically
- makes her or himself understood using German (approximate pronunciation and intonation)
- shows control of vocabulary and structures that have been practised (correct use of articles, prepositions, pronouns)
- sustains the interaction (no long pauses interfere with the message being communicated)
- uses intonation, miming, gestures, and body language to support communication
|
| | | |
*The two students who worked together collaborated to assign self-ratings.
Key:
5--Outstanding
4--Very Good
3--Satisfactory
2--Marginal
1--Not Demonstrated
Brochure
| Rating | Criteria |
| 5 |
Outstanding. Goes beyond the basic requirements to demonstrate
additional learning. For example, may include additional buildings, provide a variety
of details for each building, or use language and structures not practised in
class. Shows understanding of the layout of European cities. Information is
clearly organized. May include some minor errors in language, but these do not
detract from the overall impact. |
| 4 |
All requirements and criteria fully met in both map and descriptions. Use
of vocabulary for location and description is accurate and shows precision
and variety in places. Layout of city is appropriate. Presentation is clear and easy
to follow. May include some errors in language but these do not detract from
the overall impact. |
| 3 |
Meets most requirements at a basic level. May be inconsistent, with
some aspects stronger and more detailed than others. Use of vocabulary for
location and description is accurate, but may be repetitious. Errors may cause
some confusion in places, but the material is generally understandable.
|
| 2 |
Marginal. May deal with requirements in a cursory way or show
extreme inconsistency, with some aspects completed at a good level and
others unsatisfactory. Tends to rely on a limited vocabulary and often includes errors
in capitalization or use of articles. Material is difficult to understand in places.
|
| 1 |
Does not demonstrate listed criteria. Message may be incomprehensible, inappropriate, or extremely brief.
|
Role Play: Tourist Office
| Rating | Criteria |
| 5 |
Goes beyond requirements of the task. Criteria consistently met at a
strong level. The message is clear and easily understood by peers as well as
teacher. Includes descriptions to refine and enhance the message or add interest
to the interaction. Language shows some flow and may include vocabulary
and patterns not practised in class. Pauses do not interfere with message.
There is a clear sense of interactionthe student recognizes and responds
to simple language and patterns. May ask for a specific word or phrase and
be able to use it effectively to continue the communication.
|
| 4 |
Criteria met during most of the role play. Most of the message is
clear, appropriate, and easy to follow by both peers and teacher. Includes
some detail. Tends to rely on and repeat simple sentences and patterns.
May include frequent pauses, most often at the end of a phrase or
sentence. There is a sense of interaction, with the student able to recognize
and respond to simple questions and prompts.
|
| 3 |
Criteria met for parts of the role play. Some points are clear, but
others require effort on the part of the listener and may be difficult for peers
to understand. Tends to repeat simple patterns with few details. The student
is able to communicate in German for very short periods with
frequent hesitations and extended pauses. Little sense of interactiontends to
be focussed on own efforts and may have difficulty recognizing and
responding to prompts and questions from partner.
|
| 2 |
Attempts to address most criteria. Offers appropriate information, but
parts may be incomprehensible or delivered in English. May be very brief, and
deals with requirements in a cursory fashion. Speech may be halting, and
pauses often interfere with communication. Errors in language impede parts of
the communication. Little evidence of effective language strategies.
|
| 1 |
Does not demonstrate listed criteria. Message may be incomprehensible, inappropriate, or extremely brief.
|
Previous Page
Next Page
©Copyright 1997All Rights Reserved. Curriculum Branch.
Maintained by: International Languages Coordinator
Revised: January 26, 1999
BC Ministry of Education Home Page