German 5 to 12 IRP

Sample 2: Grade 8


Topic: European Cities and Towns


Prescribed Learning Outcomes:

Communicating

It is expected that students will:

Acquiring Information

It is expected that students will:

Overview

The teacher developed a three-week series of activities centred around European cities and towns. Evaluation of oral and written skills was based on role-play dialogues and tourist brochures of European cities.

Planning for Assessment and Evaluation

Defining the Criteria

As students worked on their assignments and practised their oral presentations, the teacher outlined the requirements and discussed the following criteria.

Role Play: Giving Directions Using City Maps

To what extent do students:

Brochure

To what extent does the brochure:

Role Play: Tourist Office

To what extent is the student able to:

Assessing and Evaluating Student Performance

The teacher used performance rating scales to evaluate students' work in this unit. Students were given copies of the rating scales and samples of projects completed previously. The rating scales were discussed in English before students began working on their assignments. For the tourist brochures, students included self-assessments with their work. For the tourist office role plays, each student was scored individually.

Role Play: Giving Directions Using City Maps

Criteria Self-Assessment Teacher Rating
Student 1Student 2Student 1Student 2
  • extracts accurate information from the map or other resources
  • uses appropriate question structures that have been learned
  • uses simple, patterned phrases correctly to give directions
  • sequences directions logically
  • makes her or himself understood using German (approximate pronunciation and intonation)
  • shows control of vocabulary and structures that have been practised (correct use of articles, prepositions, pronouns)
  • sustains the interaction (no long pauses interfere with the message being communicated)
  • uses intonation, miming, gestures, and body language to support communication
    
*The two students who worked together collaborated to assign self-ratings.

Key:
5--Outstanding
4--Very Good
3--Satisfactory
2--Marginal
1--Not Demonstrated

Brochure

Rating Criteria
5

Outstanding. Goes beyond the basic requirements to demonstrate additional learning. For example, may include additional buildings, provide a variety of details for each building, or use language and structures not practised in class. Shows understanding of the layout of European cities. Information is clearly organized. May include some minor errors in language, but these do not detract from the overall impact.

4

All requirements and criteria fully met in both map and descriptions. Use of vocabulary for location and description is accurate and shows precision and variety in places. Layout of city is appropriate. Presentation is clear and easy to follow. May include some errors in language but these do not detract from the overall impact.

3

Meets most requirements at a basic level. May be inconsistent, with some aspects stronger and more detailed than others. Use of vocabulary for location and description is accurate, but may be repetitious. Errors may cause some confusion in places, but the material is generally understandable.

2

Marginal. May deal with requirements in a cursory way or show extreme inconsistency, with some aspects completed at a good level and others unsatisfactory. Tends to rely on a limited vocabulary and often includes errors in capitalization or use of articles. Material is difficult to understand in places.

1

Does not demonstrate listed criteria. Message may be incomprehensible, inappropriate, or extremely brief.



Role Play: Tourist Office

Rating Criteria
5

Goes beyond requirements of the task. Criteria consistently met at a strong level. The message is clear and easily understood by peers as well as teacher. Includes descriptions to refine and enhance the message or add interest to the interaction. Language shows some flow and may include vocabulary and patterns not practised in class. Pauses do not interfere with message. There is a clear sense of interactionthe student recognizes and responds to simple language and patterns. May ask for a specific word or phrase and be able to use it effectively to continue the communication.

4

Criteria met during most of the role play. Most of the message is clear, appropriate, and easy to follow by both peers and teacher. Includes some detail. Tends to rely on and repeat simple sentences and patterns. May include frequent pauses, most often at the end of a phrase or sentence. There is a sense of interaction, with the student able to recognize and respond to simple questions and prompts.

3

Criteria met for parts of the role play. Some points are clear, but others require effort on the part of the listener and may be difficult for peers to understand. Tends to repeat simple patterns with few details. The student is able to communicate in German for very short periods with frequent hesitations and extended pauses. Little sense of interactiontends to be focussed on own efforts and may have difficulty recognizing and responding to prompts and questions from partner.

2

Attempts to address most criteria. Offers appropriate information, but parts may be incomprehensible or delivered in English. May be very brief, and deals with requirements in a cursory fashion. Speech may be halting, and pauses often interfere with communication. Errors in language impede parts of the communication. Little evidence of effective language strategies.

1

Does not demonstrate listed criteria. Message may be incomprehensible, inappropriate, or extremely brief.


Previous Page| Prev | TOC | Next |Next Page

©Copyright 1997All Rights Reserved. Curriculum Branch.
Maintained by: International Languages Coordinator

Revised: January 26, 1999

  BC Ministry of Education Home Page