German 5 to 12 IRP

Sample 1: Grade 6


Topic: Fashion Show


Prescribed Learning Outcomes:

Communicating

It is expected that students will:

Acquiring Information

It is expected that students will:

Overview

Over a two-week period, the teacher developed a series of activities based on fashion. Evaluation was based on participation in oral activities, labelled pictures of students' favourite clothing, and fashion commentary presentations.

Planning for Assessment and Evaluation

Students had previously learned the vocabulary for size, colour, and numbers.

Defining the Criteria

As students worked on the assignments and practised their fashion commentaries, the teacher outlined the requirements and discussed the following criteria.

Participation in Oral Activities

To what extent does the student:

Labelled Picture or Diagram

To what extent does the student:

Fashion Commentary Presentation

To what extent does the student:

Assessing and Evaluating Student Performance

The teacher used a checklist and performance rating scales to evaluate students' work in this unit. Students were given copies of the rating scales, and discussed them in English before they began working on their assignments.

The teacher used a checklist to record observations of students' participation in oral activities. From time to time, students were asked to complete the rating sheets as self-assessment. The same rating sheet was used throughout the year.

The teacher and students used a rating scale to evaluate the oral presentations. Students recorded the ratings they felt best described their work, and listed two strengths and one area for improvement in their journals. Where there was a difference between the self-rating and the teacher's evaluation, the teacher and student discussed and resolved the discrepancy.

Participation in Oral Activities

Name: ­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­

Date



 


 


 


 
CriteriaRating
  • takes risks; makes effort to speak German

 

 

 

 
  • follows simple directions for classroom routines

 

 

 

 
  • uses practised structures to ask and answer questions

 

 

 

 
  • shows interest and perseverance in using German resources

 

 

 

 
Key:
3--Independently/minimal support.
2--With some support.
1--With continuing support.
0--Not demonstrated.


Labelled Picture or Diagram

Rating Criteria
Outstanding Goes beyond the basic requirements to demonstrate additional learning (e.g., includes adjectives not presented in class).
Very Good Complete and accurate. Uses the structures and vocabulary provided to present required information. May include minor errors.
Satisfactory Basic. Includes required items using structures and vocabulary provided. May omit colour for some items, or use the wrong word in places.
Requirements Not Met May be incomplete, inappropriate, or incomprehensible.


Fashion Commentary Presentation

Rating Criteria
Outstanding Commentary exceeds basic requirements. Easy to understand. Includes some interesting or unusual detail. May use vocabulary and structures not practised in class. Speech shows some fluency and expressiveness. Uses effective strategies to support communication and self-corrects where needed.
Very Good Meets task requirements. Comprehensible (may need some inferences by the listener). Uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary and structures practised in class to describe the clothing. Speech shows some expression and flow, but may be stilted in places. May attempt to self-correct.
Satisfactory Presentation is largely recited, with frequent pauses. Speech is comprehensible with some effort on the part of the listener (the teacher may understand easily; students may have difficulty). May offer little elaboration, providing only basic information. Tends to use the same pattern repeatedly. Communication is stilted; often word by word. May ignore or fail to recognize errors.
Not Demonstrated Inappropriate, incomprehensible, or incomplete.


Previous Page| Prev | TOC | Next |Next Page

©Copyright 1997All Rights Reserved. Curriculum Branch.
Maintained by: International Languages Coordinator

Revised: January 26, 1999

  BC Ministry of Education Home Page