Fine Arts IconSample 2
Jazz Dance Styles

This samples might be covered in a sequence of 15 to 20 classes.
In these examples of criterion referenced evaluation students:

Learning Outcomes

The teacher, in discussion with the students, decided to assess with reference to the following learning outcomes:

In addition to these outcomes, the teacher also assessed the student's:

Defining Criteria

It was decided that students would be evaluated according to these criteria:

Assessing and Evaluating Student Performance

Each student kept a daily journal of self-evaluation and on-going comments on creative projects and skills acquisition. Each student was given a daily mark by the teacher on his/her willingness to participate and effort shown. Written analysis of the video was assigned. The technical progress of the dancers was evaluated by the teacher using observation and videotaping. Students evaluated each other's performing techniques informally. At the end, students evaluated their own contributions to the group using a rating scale, and both teachers and students evaluated the choreography of the group.

The following is a possible process for weighting the evaluations:

The student and teacher agreed that the course components would contribute to the mark for this section of the course in the following proportions:

Written work was rated on the basis of two assignments as follows:

Assignment 1-Analysis

Analyze jazz dancing using elements of dance as the framework. The following could be components of a student worksheet:

Overall comment:

Criteria for evaluation for this analysis could include the extent to which the student:

Assignment 2-Journal

Areas to be evaluated:

Choreography: 20%

All students in a group receive the same mark from the teacher's evaluation using a rating scale.

Teacher criteria were based on the extent to which the piece demonstrates the use and understanding of:

Scale for evaluation

3 &nbspelement is clearly presented
2 &nbspnot clear, needs more evidence, lacks some necessary quality
1 &nbsprequirement suggested but not fully shown
0 &nbspnot included

Group work/evaluation: 5%

Students use self-evaluation of their own group work and peer evaluation of the performances of other groups using the following student evaluation forms:

Group Work Self-Evaluation

  1. What was the most positive accomplishment of your group? How did you achieve it?
  2. What was the biggest problem your group had? Did you solve it? If not, why not?
  3. Explain your attitude towards the project of the group. Did your attitude change during the project? If so, why and in what way?
  4. Describe your own contribution to the group project.
  5. Who helped your group most? In what way?
  6. Would you change your approach to group work in the future? If so, how?
Which best represents your contibution to the group, 5 being the highest. Circle mark:

5    4   &nbsp3   &nbsp2    1

Students could evaluate informally the performance of individuals or of groups using a check list (yes/no) to be filled in as they watch a performance as follows:

Performance checklist
(informal evaluation for use by students watching their peers presentation)

Checklist: yes/no


Previous Page Next Page

Table of Contents

Province of British Columbia
Ministry of Education
Curriculum Branch © 1995 Copyright

Maintained by: Fine Arts Coordinator

Revised: April 1995

Ministry of Education Home Page