English Lang. Arts Icon

Appendix D: Evaluation Example


Sample 3: Grade 9

Topic: Multiculturalism

Prescribed Learning Outcomes

Comprehend and Respond (Strategies and Skills)

It is expected that students will:

Comprehend and Respond (Comprehension)

It is expected that students will:

Comprehend and Respond (Engagement and Personal Response)

It is expected that students will:

Communicate Ideas and Information (Composing and Creating)

It is expected that students will:

Communicate Ideas and Information (Improving Communications)

It is expected that students will:

Communicate Ideas and Information (Presenting and Valuing)

It is expected that students will:

Self and Society (Personal Awareness)

It is expected that students will:

Self and Society (Working Together)

It is expected that students will:

Self and Society (Building Community)

It is expected that students will:

Overview

This unit involved students in a series of activities related to reading the novel The War Between the Classes and reading articles and poetry from an Issues collection anthology entitled Multiculturalism. Evaluation was based on:

Planning for Assessment and Evaluation

Defining the Criteria

The teacher reviewed with students the learning outcomes for these activities and explained the requirements of each task. Together, the teacher and students decided that the following key criteria should be demonstrated in the assigned tasks.

Interview Questions

Article Based on the Interview

Verbal/Visual Poster

Self-Assessment of Reading Strategies and Approaches

Assessing and Evaluating Student Performance

The teacher and students used criteria lists and rating scales to assess and evaluate student performance.

Interview Questions

CriteriaStrongCompetent Developing Not Demonstrated
  • variety of question types­open-ended, closed, personal, public
    
  • demonstrate knowledge and awareness of person being interviewed
    
  • probing and insightful, but also reflect empathy and courtesy
    
  • order and flow encourage dialogue
    
  • clear, relatively short, and easy to understand
    
  • demonstrate understanding of immigration and multiculturalism issues
    
Comments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Article Based on the Interview

RatingCriteria
Outstanding
  • engaging, creative, and thoughtful
  • precise, vivid, and sophisticated vocabulary; varied patterns and lengths of sentences
  • coherent and organized structure
  • chosen form effectively and innovatively conveys content
  • relevant and intriguing use of details to convey personality and experience of person interviewed
  • few surface feature errors; only noticeable if looking for them
Very Good
  • clear and thoughtful
  • complex, precise vocabulary and varied sentences
  • logical organization
  • chosen form effectively conveys content
  • relevant and careful use of details to convey personality and experience of person interviewed
  • few surface feature errors; occasional spelling or punctuation errors
Good
  • quite well developed and detailed
  • generally precise vocabulary and complex sentence structures containing minimal errors
  • obvious organization
  • chosen form appropriate for content
  • relevant use of details to convey personality and experience of person interviewed
  • generally few surface feature errors; some punctuation, spelling, or pronoun reference errors
Satisfactory
  • direct and usually clear
  • straightforward vocabulary and effective sentences that are rarely complex or varied
  • organization evident
  • chosen form generally appropriate for content
  • competent use of details to convey personality and experience of person interviewed
  • surface feature errors such as comma splice, spelling, or pronoun reference errors
Minimally Acceptable
  • limited clarity and thought
  • unsophisticated and, at times, inappropriate vocabulary with simple sentences
  • evidence of some organization
  • chosen form rarely conveys content effectively
  • inconsistent use of details to convey personality and experience of person interviewed
  • surface feature errors may at times distract reader
  • message is clear, understandable, and thought-provoking


Verbal/Visual Poster

CriteriaRating
  • uses colour, shape, and mood to convey message
3    2    1    0
  • visually pleasing in terms of arrangement, colour, images
3    2    1    0
  • attention to detail evident
3    2    1    0
  • slogan insightful and stimulating
3    2    1    0
Comments
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Self-Assessment of Reading Strategies and Approaches*

RatingCriteria
Strong/Interpretive
    Deals with material independently. Able to draw on previous knowledge of topic. Uses different ways of approaching material, depending on purpose. Creates personal context to cope with unusual or decontextualized material.
Confident
    Approaches most reading tasks confidently. Has a sense of how to go about the task and the skills and strategies that can solve reading problems. Understands how she or he reads and how meaning is affected by personal knowledge as well as by what an author writes.
Purposeful
    Adapts approach to different purposes and materials (e.g., adjusts reading speed, uses context and other cues, recalls strategies). Able to focus on reading for an extended period of time. May also return to the same reading task over several sessions.
Functional
    Comfortable with most reading tasks. Aware of how he or she is reading and frequently uses strategies such as previewing. Monitors reading by checking to see if material is making sense. Uses context cues to support or correct reading.
Developing
    Usually more concerned with making sense than precise word-for-word accuracy. Tries to self-correct while reading and may ask for specific help. Frequently uses pictures and other cues to confirm meaning.
Reading Goals
Write two things to focus on in order to improve your reading strategies and approaches.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

* Based on the "Strategies and Approaches" section of the reference set Evaluating Reading Across Curriculum.


Previous PagePrev TOC NextNext Page


© Copyright 1996. All Rights Reserved. Curriculum Branch.
Maintained by: English Language Arts Coordinator

Revised: January 25, 1999

  BC Ministry of Education Home Page