English Lang. Arts Icon

Appendix D: Evaluation Example


Sample 2: Grade 9

Topic: The Sporting Challenge

Prescribed Learning Outcomes

Comprehend and Respond (Comprehension)

It is expected that students will:

Comprehend and Respond (Engagement and Personal Response)

It is expected that students will:

Comprehend and Respond (Critical Analysis)

It is expected that students will:

Communicate Ideas and Information (Composing and Creating)

It is expected that students will:

Communicate Ideas and Information (Presenting and Valuing)

It is expected that students will:

Self and Society (Personal Awareness)

It is expected that students will:

Self and Society (Working Together)

It is expected that students will:

Self and Society (Building Community)

It is expected that students will:

Overview

The unit involved students in a series of activities related to reading poems, stories, and non-fiction in the Sports in Literature Anthology: Literature and Writing through Poems, Stories, and Non-Fiction. Evaluation was based on three assignments:

Planning for Assessment and Evaluation

Defining the Criteria

The teacher reviewed with students the learning outcomes for these activities and explained the requirements of each task. The teacher and students decided that the following key criteria should be demonstrated in the assigned tasks.

Flip Book

Personal Writing

Baseball Questions for Reading

Assessing and Evaluating Student Performance

The teacher and students used criteria lists and rating scales to assess and evaluate student performance.

Flip Book­Peer Evaluation and Teacher Evaluation

CriteriaRating
  • content and visual display are original, creative, and engaging for the reader
5    4    3    2    1    0
  • includes required components for each section
5    4    3    2    1    0
  • has sense of personal connection and thoughtful interpretation
5    4    3    2    1    0
  • writing is clear and purposeful within the conventions of the form
5    4    3    2    1    0
  • provides specific references to selections read
5    4    3    2    1    0
  • few surface feature errors; only noticeable if looking for them
5    4    3    2    1    0


Personal Writing

RatingCriteria
Outstanding
  • engaging, creative, and thoughtful presentation of personal event or viewpoint
  • precise, vivid, and sophisticated vocabulary; varied patterns and lengths of sentences
  • coherent and organized structure
  • chosen form effectively and innovatively conveys content
  • use of figurative language skillfully enhances mood and meaning
  • few surface feature errors; only noticeable if looking for them
Very Good
  • clear and thoughtful presentation of personal event or viewpoint
  • complex, precise vocabulary and varied sentences
  • logical organization
  • chosen form effectively conveys content
  • use of figurative language enhances mood and meaning
  • few surface feature errors; might be occasional spelling or punctuation errors
Good
  • quite well-developed and detailed presentation of personal event or viewpoint
  • generally precise vocabulary and complex sentence structures containing minimal errors
  • obvious organization
  • chosen form appropriate for content
  • attempts to use figurative language to convey mood and meaning
  • generally few surface feature errors; some punctuation, spelling, or pronoun reference errors
Satisfactory
  • direct and usually easy-to-read presentation of personal event or viewpoint
  • straightforward vocabulary and effective sentences that are rarely complex or varied
  • competent organization
  • chosen form generally appropriate for content
  • seldom uses figurative language or use may be vague or unclear
  • surface feature errors such as comma splice, spelling, or pronoun reference errors
Minimally Acceptable
  • limited clarity and thought in presentation of personal event or viewpoint
  • unsophisticated and, at times, inappropriate vocabulary with simple sentences lacking in variety
  • evidence of some organization
  • chosen form rarely conveys content effectively
  • figurative language unclear or not used
  • surface feature errors may at times distract reader


Baseball Questions for Reading

RatingCriteria
Strong
    Questions and answers demonstrate the criteria at a strong level; exceed requirements.
Competent
    Criteria are competently demonstrated. Questions and answers are satisfactory.
Minimal
    Questions and answers offer minimal evidence of the criteria.


Previous PagePrev TOC NextNext Page


© Copyright 1996. All Rights Reserved. Curriculum Branch.
Maintained by: English Language Arts Coordinator

Revised: January 25, 1999

  BC Ministry of Education Home Page