Internal Review
When first drafted, a curriculum document is circulated for review within the Ministry of Education. Individuals and groups in various parts of the Ministry are invited to offer comments and suggestions for improvement from the perspective of their particular area of responsibility/expertise. All comments and suggestions are taken into consideration as a second draft of the curriculum is prepared. The second draft or "Response Draft" is submitted for initial approval and sign-off by executive within the Ministry of Education and posted to the Ministry website for public review and response.
External Review
Once a "Response Draft" has been approved and signed off within the Ministry of Education, it is posted on the Ministry of Education website for public review and response – i.e., to elicit comments from individuals and groups who are members of the general pubic.
Concurrently, Ministry of Education curriculum staff liaise with government ministries in which there is expertise relevant to the particular curriculum under development/revision. Individuals and groups in these other ministries are invited to offer comments and suggestions for improvement from the perspective of alignment with the current policies and initiatives of that ministry. Comments and suggestions for improvements are taken into consideration as the curriculum document is finalized.
The following guidelines provide a framework for reviewing each draft curriculum and offering comments and suggestions about the extent to which the needs and interests of diverse learners have been taken into consideration.
General Considerations
When examining the various components of the draft curriculum from the perspective of inclusion and accessibility for all students, reviewers consider whether the draft document:
- supports the principles of learning
- is accurate in terms of subject matter and portrayals
- is current and relevant
- provides prescribed learning outcomes, suggested achievement indicators, examples, instruction, and assessment that are accessible for a variety of teaching and learning styles
- provides opportunities for students to develop critical thinking, problem solving, and communication skills
- promotes awareness, understanding, and respect for the diversity of Canadian society;
- reflects and validates the life experience of students of varied backgrounds, interests, abilities, and needs
- provides positive role models and presents different points of view
- reflects accurate representations and avoids stereotype
- supports the development of positive social attitudes and promotes respect for diversity and human rights
Specific Considerations
Reviewers examine the various components of the draft document for accuracy, inclusion, and accessibility from a variety of perspectives. These include:
- Aboriginal Peoples - the representation of Aboriginal peoples, both in historical and contemporary context, is portrayed accurately; recognizes the diversity of cultures present among Aboriginal peoples
- Age - representation of individuals and groups at various stages along the continuum of life; portrayals are realistic and avoid stereotype
- Belief System - topics of philosophy, religion and/or political ideology, when included in the draft curriculum, are presented with a clear purpose and provide opportunity for critical thinking; make a clear distinction between fact and opinion and do not advocate one belief system over another
- Ability-Disability - representation of experiences and perspectives of individuals and groups along the continuum of ability-disability; portrayal is realistic and accurate; emphasis is on ability and contribution
- Ethical and Legal - issues that may be subject to legal or ethical debate, when included in the draft curriculum, are presented with a clear purpose and provide opportunity for critical thinking; make a clear distinction between fact and opinion; provide opportunity for expanded understanding of alternative points of view, and provide accurate and current data
- Gender Identity and Sexual Orientation - representation of individuals and groups across the full range of gender identity and sexual orientation; contributions are emphasized; portrayals are positive, non-denigrating, reflect diversity, and avoid stereotype
- Gender Roles - representation of females and males in diverse roles and relationships; portrayals reflect diversity and avoid stereotype
- Humour - if included, is used to engage student interest in the subject; humour is used in a positive, non-denigrating manner
- Language - language used contributes to audience engagement and/or instructional effectiveness; is age appropriateness; does not overuse specific language for effect or language that has limited meaning; is disrespectful, discourteous, or defamatory
- Multiculturalism - the representation of diverse cultures is accurate and respectful; the document presents positive cultural role models; accurate reference to dialect, customs, dress and diet; acknowledgment of similarities and differences within and among cultures and ethno-specific groups
- Safe Schools - the draft curriculum reflects legal and community standards of safe practice and common sense; provides opportunities for students to understand the importance of safe practices and to develop understanding of personal responsibility as it relates to safety of self and others; models safe practice and common sense; inclusion of directions/instructions for safe equipment use and materials handling
- Socio-Economic - representation reflects the full range the realities of day-to-day life in Canadian society; respects the socio-economic realities of British Columbia students
- Violence - violence, tension, and graphic imagery, where included in the draft curriculum, have a clear purpose and support instruction; the level and degree of explicitness takes into account the age and maturity of intended audience; provides opportunities for modelling effective problem-solving and conflict resolution strategies; and opportunities for students to develop compassion and empathy.