Tech Icon

Sample 6: Grade 10



Topic: Friendship

1. Prescribed Learning Outcomes:

Communicating
It is expected that students will:

Aquiring Information
It is expected that students will:

Experiencing Creative Works
It is expected that students will:

Understanding Cultural Influences
It is expected that students will:

2. Overview

The teacher developed a three-week unit on friendship that included:

3. Planning for Assessment and Evaluation

Gallery Walk

 

4. Defining the Criteria

The teacher reviewed the learning outcomes for these activities, explained the requirements of each task, and discussed key criteria with students.

Participation in Oral Activities
To what extent does the student:

Webbing Personality Traits
To what extent does the student:

Public Service Announcement
To what extent does the student:

Internet Research on Friendship
To what extent does the student:

Visual and Written Personal Response to the Poem
To what extent does the student:
Visual

Written

Soap Opera Video
To what extent does the student:

5. Assessing and Evaluating Student Performance

The teacher used performance rating scales to evaluate students' work on this unit. Students were given copies of the rating scales, and discussed them in English before they began working on their assignments. Teachers and students discussed and used the scales to assess and provide feedback on the public service announcements, poem responses, and soap opera videos. These scales were adapted and used throughout the year to assess visual, oral, and written work.

Participation in Oral Activities

 

Date

 

 

 

 

Criteria
Rating
  • follows instructions

 

 

 

 

  • uses French to ask and respond to questions from other students
       
  • responds to and supports others in their use of French
       
  • takes risks, shows interest, and perseveres
       
Key:
3 - Independently/minimal support
2 - With some support
1 - With continuing support
0 - Not demonstrated

 

Webbing Personality Traits

Rating
Criteria
Outstanding
4
Goes beyond the basic requirements to demonstrate additional learning. Web chart includes relevant and interesting details, shows appropriate organization of information, and communicates an understandable message.
Good
3

Complete and accurate. Includes relevant details, shows appropriate organization of information, and communicates an understandable message. may include minor errors.

Satisfactory
2

Basic. Includes required items. May omit some details.

Requirements Not Met
1

May be incomplete, inappropriate, or incomprehensible.

 

Public Service Announcement

Criteria
Assessment*
Teacher Rating

 

 

Self
Peer

 

Group
A

Group
B
Group
C
Group
D
Group
A
Group
B
Group
C
Group
D
  • speaks comprehensibly

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • accurately identifies and describes the qualities of friendship

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • takes risks to include new or unfamiliar language that enhances each description

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • correctly uses the frames and vocabulary provided

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • uses gesture and expression to support communication

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*Students who worked together collaborated to assign self-ratings.

Key:
3 - Strong
2 - Satisfactory
1 - Needs improvement
0 - Not demonstrated

 

Internet Research on Friendship

Criteria
Rarely
Sometimes
Always
  • accesses a variety of electronic sources (such as French search engines and web sites

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • downloads appopriate data from the Internet

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Visual and Written Personal Response to the Poem

 

Rating
Comments
Self
Peer
Teacher
Criteria: Visual Response

 

 

 

 

  • demonstrates an understanding of the content of the poem

 

 

 

 

  • includes relevant and creative detail

 

 

 

 

  • shows consideration for the audience (e.g., varied, eye-catching)

 

 

 

 

  • provides a comprehensible message
       
Overall Rating for
Visual Response

 

 

 

 

Criteria: Written Response

 

     
shows appropriate organization of information

 

     
demonstrates an understanding of the content of the poem

 

     
uses a range of appropriate vocabulary, including new vocabulary from the poem, to support and enrich the message

 

     
Overall Rating for
Written Response

 

     
Key:
3 - Independently/minimal support
2 - With some support
1 - With continuing support
0 - Not demonstrated


Soap Opera Video

Rating
Criteria
Outstanding
5
Includes all components of the project. Strong attempt to engage the audience through use of interesting dialogue, character development, detail, costumes, props, and possibly humour. Uses a wide range of expressions and vocabulary with limited repetition. Creatively attempts to model a soap opera, with a sense of pacing and flow in the dialogue. May include minor errors in usage or pronunciation, but these do not detract from message.
Strong
4

Includes components of the project. Attempts to engage the audience through dialogue, some character development, detail, costumes, props, and possibly humour. Uses a range of expressions and vocabulary with some repetition. Attempts to model a soap opera. May include errors in pronunciation, but message is still clearly communicated.

Satisfactory
3

Meets requirements. Video lacks creativity; is without costumes, props, and character development. Major components of video are appropriate, but lack supporting detail or attempt to engage audience. Uses a limited range of expressions or vocabulary with repetition. Message is comprehensible, but errors may require more effort for audience to comprehend.

Needs Improvement
2

Meets some requirements. Design of video impedes understanding. Includes most required information, but may be very brief, with little detail. In most cases, shows little awareness of audience-often little sense of communication. Soap opera form is not evident. May rely on simple, basic vocabulary and repeat the same structures. Errors interfere with communication.

Not Demonstrated
1

Does not meet requirements. May be incomprehensible, inappropriate, or incomplete.

 


Previous Page | Prev| TOC |Next |Next Page

© Copyright 2001 All Rights Reserved. BC MOE Curriculum Branch.
Maintained by: International Languages Coordinator

Last Modified: February 2002

  BC Ministry of Education Home Page