Topic: Friendship
1.
Prescribed Learning Outcomes:
Communicating
It is expected
that students will:
Aquiring
Information
It is expected that students will:
Experiencing Creative
Works
It is expected that students will:
Understanding Cultural
Influences
It is expected that students will:
2. Overview
The teacher developed a three-week unit on friendship that included:
3. Planning for Assessment and Evaluation
Gallery
Walk

4. Defining the Criteria
The teacher reviewed the learning outcomes for these activities, explained the requirements of each task, and discussed key criteria with students.
Participation in Oral
Activities
To what extent does the student:
Webbing Personality
Traits
To what extent does the student:
Public Service Announcement
To what extent does the student:
Internet Research
on Friendship
To what extent does the student:
Visual and Written
Personal Response to the Poem
To what extent does the student:
Visual
Written
Soap Opera Video
To what extent does the student:
5. Assessing and Evaluating Student Performance
The teacher used performance rating scales to evaluate students' work on this unit. Students were given copies of the rating scales, and discussed them in English before they began working on their assignments. Teachers and students discussed and used the scales to assess and provide feedback on the public service announcements, poem responses, and soap opera videos. These scales were adapted and used throughout the year to assess visual, oral, and written work.
Participation in Oral Activities
|
|
Date
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Criteria
|
Rating
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| Key: |
3 - Independently/minimal
support 2 - With some support 1 - With continuing support 0 - Not demonstrated |
Webbing Personality Traits
|
Rating
|
Criteria
|
|
Outstanding
4 |
Goes beyond the basic requirements to demonstrate additional learning. Web chart includes relevant and interesting details, shows appropriate organization of information, and communicates an understandable message. |
|
Good
3 |
|
|
Satisfactory
2 |
|
|
Requirements
Not Met
1 |
|
Public Service Announcement
|
Criteria
|
Assessment*
|
Teacher
Rating
|
|||||||
|
|
Self
|
Peer
|
|
||||||
|
Group |
Group
B |
Group
C |
Group
D |
Group
A |
Group
B |
Group
C |
Group
D |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Students who worked together collaborated to assign self-ratings.
| Key: |
3 - Strong 2 - Satisfactory 1 - Needs improvement 0 - Not demonstrated |
Internet Research on Friendship
|
Criteria
|
Rarely
|
Sometimes
|
Always
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Visual and Written Personal Response to the Poem
|
|
Rating
|
Comments
|
||
|
Self
|
Peer
|
Teacher
|
||
| Criteria: Visual Response |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Overall
Rating for
Visual Response |
|
|
|
|
| Criteria: Written Response |
|
|||
| shows appropriate organization of information |
|
|||
| demonstrates an understanding of the content of the poem |
|
|||
| uses a range of appropriate vocabulary, including new vocabulary from the poem, to support and enrich the message |
|
|||
|
Overall
Rating for
Written Response |
|
|||
| Key: |
3 - Independently/minimal
support 2 - With some support 1 - With continuing support 0 - Not demonstrated |
Soap Opera Video
|
Rating
|
Criteria
|
|
Outstanding
5 |
Includes all components of the project. Strong attempt to engage the audience through use of interesting dialogue, character development, detail, costumes, props, and possibly humour. Uses a wide range of expressions and vocabulary with limited repetition. Creatively attempts to model a soap opera, with a sense of pacing and flow in the dialogue. May include minor errors in usage or pronunciation, but these do not detract from message. |
|
Strong
4 |
|
|
Satisfactory
3 |
|
|
Needs
Improvement
2 |
|
|
Not
Demonstrated
1 |
|
©
Copyright 2001 All Rights
Reserved. BC MOE Curriculum Branch.
Maintained by: International Languages Coordinator
Last Modified: February 2002