Tech Icon

Sample 5: Grade 9



Topic: Electronic Correspondence

1. Prescribed Learning Outcomes:

Communicating
It is expected that students will:

Aquiring Information
It is expected that students will:

Experiencing Creative Works
It is expected that students will:

Understanding Cultural Influences
It is expected that students will:

2. Overview

The teacher developed a series of web-based activities to initiate correspondence with students in a Francophone culture. The teacher considered a variety of ways to do this, for example, by students corresponding with individual students in another class, by the class as a whole creating messages for another class, or by having students participate in a student listserv or chat group. The introductory activities occurred continuously over two weeks of classes, while the correspondence process continued for the remainder of the school year.

Although this sample deals with electronic correspondence, it can be easily adapted to a penpal situation.

Evaluation was based on:

3. Planning for Assessment and Evaluation

Information Sheet

 
Chez nous
Au (Maroc)

Le climat

La population

Un paysage typique

Les passe-temps favoris

La nourriture typique

La musique typique

Les sports populaires

 

 

 

 

 


Correspondence Log

Date
From/To
Sent/Rec'd (S/R)
General Message Idea (S)
General Message Idea

 

 

 

       

4. Defining the Criteria

The teacher reviewed the learning outcomes for these activities, then explained the requirements of each task to the students. The teacher and students decided the following key criteria should be demonstrated in the assigned tasks.

Accessing Information on the Internet
To what extent does the student:

Participation in Oral Activities
To what extent does the student:

Web Chart/Mind Map on the Benefits of Having a Keypal
To what extent does the student:

Information Sheet
To what extent does the student:

Oral Presentation of the Information Sheet
To what extent does the student:

E-mail Letters to Keypal
To what extent does the student:

Multimedia Presentation on the Keypal
To what extent does the student:

5. Assessing and Evaluating Student Performance

The teacher used performance rating scales to evaluate students' work on this unit. Students were given copies of the rating scales, and discussed them in English before working on their assignments. Teachers and students used the scales to assess and provide feedback on the posters, information sheets, information presentations, and e-mail letters. These scales were adapted and used throughout the year to assess visual, oral, and written work.

Accessing Information on the Internet

Criteria
Rarely
Sometimes
Always
  • accesses a variety of electronic sources (such as French search engines and web sites

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • downloads appopriate data from the Interne

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Participation in Oral Activities

 

Date

 

 

 

 

Criteria
Rating
  • interacts with the information through questions, responses, and following instructions

 

 

 

 

  • uses French to ask and respond to questions from the teacher and other students
       
  • speaks French during class and group activities
       
  • responds to and supports others when they are speaking French
       
Key:
3 - Independently/minimal support
2 - With some support
1 - With continuing support
0 - Not demonstrated

 

Web Chart/Mind Map on the Benefits of Having a Keypal

Criteria
Rating
  • provides complete information

 

  • includes relevant and interesting details

 

  • uses appropriate vocabulary, spelled correctly
 
  • shows appropriate organization of information

 

Key:
3 - Strong
2 - Satisfactory
1 - Needs improvement
0 - Not demonstrated

 

Student Mobiles

Criteria
Rating
  • provides all required information

 

  • includes relevant and interesting details

 

  • uses appropriate vocabulary, spelled correctly
 
  • shows appropriate organization of information

 

  • reproduces French words and patterns in understandable form

 

Key:
3 - Strong
2 - Satisfactory
1 - Needs improvement
0 - Not demonstrated

 

Oral Presentation of the Information Sheet

 

Rating
Comments
Self
Peer
Teacher
  • presents information clearly

 

 

 

 

  • includes relevant or interesting detials or features

 

 

 

 

  • speaks smoothly - most pauses occur at the end of phrases or sentences

 

 

 

 

  • uses a variety of vocabulary and language structures appropriate to the subject

 

 

 

 

Overall Rating for
Oral Presentation

 

 

 

 

Key:
3 - Independently/minimal support
2 - With some support
1 - With continuing support
0 - Not demonstrated


E-mail Letters to Keypal

Note: Communication of meaning is the most important consideration and should receive the greatest weighting in assigning a grade.

Rating
Criteria
Outstanding
5
Goes beyond the requirements of the task to demonstrate extended learning or new applications. Offers clear, relevant, and appropriate information. Includes interesting details or features. Asks questions about or makes comparisons with local community. Includes information about personal tastes, school, and community customs. Asks questions about comparable customs or behaviour patterns. Uses a variety of vocabulary and language structures. Spelling and mechanics do not interfere with meaning.
Good
4

Information is clear, relevant, accurate, and offers some details. Asks questions and makes some comparisons with local community. Includes some information about personal tastes, school, and community customs. Asks questions about keypal's customs. Uses a range of useful vocabulary and structures, with some repetition. May include some structural errors, but these do not obscure meaning.

Satisfactory
3

Writing is comprehensible but may be unclear in places, often because of problems with organization. Links between ideas may be weak or confusing. Includes general information about school and everyday life and asks some questions. Vocabulary tends to be basic and concrete. May include errors in word choice, structures, or surface features, but these do not seriously obscure meaning.

Minimally Acceptable
2

Attempts to ask questions and provide general information. Supporting details may be confusing, irrelevant, or inappropriate. Vocabulary and patterns tend to be basic and repetitive. Writing may be incomprehensible in places because of errors in word choice, word order, or sentence structure. May be very brief. The writing tends to be repetitive and lacks a sense of general organization.

Not Yet Acceptable
1

Information is unclear, incomplete, or inappropriate. May be very short. A large number of errors may make it impossible for the reader to understand the writer's views.

 

Oral and Multimedia Presentation

Note: Communication of meaning is the most important consideration and should receive the greatest weighting in assigning a grade.

Rating
Criteria
Outstanding
5
Goes beyond the requirements of the task to demonstrate extended learning or new applications. Takes risks with language, sometimes making errors when attempting to express complexities or subtleties. Information is clear, relevant, accurate, and logically organized. The presentation has oral, visual, and musical components that contribute to a full understanding of the keypal. A wide range of visual aids and oral explanations enriches the presentation. Errors in language use do not detract from meaning.
Strong
5
Information is clear, relevant, accurate, and detailed. The presentation has oral, visual, and musical components, with visual aids and oral explanations that enrich the presentation. May include some repetition and structural errors, but these do not obscure meaning.
Competent
4

Information is clear, relevant, and accurate. Some detail is presented to support views, but links between ideas may be weak in places. The presentation has basic oral, visual, and musical components. Language and visual components tend to be basic and concrete. May include errors in tense or structure, but meaning is clear.

Developing
3

Information is relevant and accurate, but may be unclear in places. Some detail is presented to support views, but links between ideas may be weak or confusing. Presentation has few visual, oral, and musical components, which do not necessarily enrich the understanding of the keypal. Vocabulary and structures tend to be basic and repetitive. May include errors in tense, structure, and occasionally, spelling (indicating that the student did not use a dictionary or other resources to check his or her work), but these do not seriously affect meaning.

Underdeveloped
2

Attempts to address the topic. Some accurate information is presented, but some of the supporting detail may be confusing, irrelevant, or inappropriate. Vocabulary tends to be basic and repetitive with little appropriate use of French idiom. Errors in tense, structure, and spelling may make it difficult for the audience to understand the meaning in places. The presentation tends to be choppy, repetitive, and lacks a sense of logical organization.

Requirement Not Met
1

Information or message is unclear, incomplete, or inappropriate. May be very short. A large number of errors may make it impossible for the audience to understand the presenter's view.

 


Previous Page | Prev| TOC |Next |Next Page

© Copyright 2001 All Rights Reserved. BC MOE Curriculum Branch.
Maintained by: International Languages Coordinator

Last Modified: February 2002

  BC Ministry of Education Home Page