International Languages Icon

Sample 3: Grade 8

Topic : Corresponding With Deaf Peers

Prescribed Learning Outcomes:

Communicating

It is expected that students will:

Acquiring Information

It is expected that students will:

Understanding Culture and Society

It is expected that students will:

In addition to these outcomes, the teacher assessed students' attitudes and work habits.

Overview

The teacher developed a series of activities to initiate videotaped correspondence between students and pen pals. Students were asked to use a variety of technologies (e.g., video, e-mail). The activities occurred over several weeks, rather than as a continuous unit, to allow time for correspondence to be sent and received. Evaluation was based on video correspondence to pen pals and ASL presentations based on the correspondence.

Planning for Assessment and Evaluation

Defining the Criteria

The teacher reviewed the learning outcomes for the activities and explained the requirements of each task. The teacher and students decided on the key criteria that should be demonstrated.

Video Correspondence

To what extent does the student:

Presentation

Presenting

To what extent does the student:

Observing

To what extent does the student:

Assessing and Evaluating Student Performance

The teacher used performance rating scales to evaluate students' demonstrations of the learning outcomes. Students were given copies of the rating scales in advance. Similar scales were used for other assignments throughout the year. During each ASL presentation, three students were designated to provide peer feedback to the presenter.

Video Correspondence

Note: Communication of meaning is the most important consideration.

Rating Criteria
Excellent Includes interesting details or features. Message is relevant and appropriate. Meaning is clear. Errors in sign production and so on do not interfere with meaning. Takes risks -- uses a variety of phrases and structures, including some that have not been practised in class and, consequently, may not be used appropriately. Asks questions about or makes comparisons with the local Deaf community that indicate use of ASL and Deaf community materials (e.g., TTY, decoders, auxiliary assistance). Includes information about school or community customs and traditions and asks questions about comparable topics.
Good May include some interesting details or features. Message is relevant and appropriate. Meaning is clear with a little effort on the part of the reader. Errors in sign production, structures, and so on do not obscure meaning. Uses a variety of sign vocabulary and language structures practised in class. Asks questions about or makes comparisons with the local Deaf community that indicate use of ASL and Deaf community materials (e.g., TTY, captions, auxiliary assistance). Includes information about school or community customs and asks questions about comparable customs or behaviour patterns.
Acceptable Includes most of the details discussed in class. Message is relevant and appropriate. The reader can understand most of the message with some effort. Errors in word choice, spelling, and so on occasionally obscure meaning. Uses a variety of vocabulary and language structures practised in class. Asks questions about or makes comparisons with the local Deaf community that indicate use of ASL materials (e.g., maps). Includes some information about school or community customs.
Not Demonstrated The criteria for acceptable performance were not evident.

Presentation
Aspect Teacher/Peer Self
Rating Comment Rating Comment
Presentation
  • main points are understandable
       
  • information is relevent and appropriate
       
  • includes interesting details or features
       
  • uses a variety of sign vocabulary and language structures
       
  • is fluid (uses ASL pauses appropriately)
       
  • answers questions in ASL with relevent information
       
  • compares own customs, traditions, or behavioural patterns with those of video pal
       
Observing
  • records three to five details from each presentation
       
  • asks at least one question that is relevent and that requires information the presenter did not provide
       
  • asks questions in ASL that are understandable
       

Key: 

ST-Strong
SA-Satisfactory
MI-Minimal
NE-Not Evident


Previous Page| Prev | TOC | Next |Next Page

© Copyright 1999 All Rights Reserved. Curriculum Branch.
Maintained by: International Languages Coordinator

Revised: February 5, 1999

  BC Ministry of Education Home Page